While determining the permissibility of a public offering, SEBI takes into consideration pending adjudicatory, regulatory and other proceedings against the Parties and therefore timelines for the issuance of Observations are critical. Although the 2006 Order clarified the approach and timelines for keeping Observations in abeyance (if a probable cause of violation was found or show cause notice issued), it did not adequately address timelines to be followed for keeping Observations in abeyance when proceedings against Parties were not concluded within given timelines for reasons beyond SEBI’s control or owing to the conduct of the Parties themselves. Further, there was no provision to address cases where (i) proceedings for recovery against any of the Parties was initiated by SEBI; (ii) an order for disgorgement or monetary penalty was passed against any of the Parties and was not complied with; (iii) any direction issued by SEBI was not complied with by any of the Parties; or (iv) the issuer was restrained by a court from making a public issue or filing offer document.
The General Order therefore addresses some of these gaps.
Reduction in timeline for keeping Observations on draft offer documents in abeyance to 30 days (earlier 45 days)
Where there is a probable cause for investigation/enquiry or where an investigation or enquiry is ongoing, the timeline for keeping Observations in abeyance has been reduced to 30 days (earlier 45 days) from the later of, (i) the date of such probable cause of violation being found; or (ii) the date of filing of the draft offer document.
Further, the General Order provides that if SEBI cannot conclude proceedings within this period for reasons beyond its control or owing to the conduct of entities other than the Parties, Observations should be kept in abeyance for a further 30 days. However, if the delay in concluding proceedings is due to the conduct of any of the Parties, Observations should be kept in abeyance until the conclusion of the investigation, enquiry or examination.
Timeline where show-cause notice is issued and conclusion of proceeding is delayed
Under the 2006 Order, if a show-cause notice was issued to Parties, Observations were to be kept in abeyance for 90 days from the filing of the draft offer document. In the absence of an interim or final order within this period, the Observations were issued, subject to relevant disclosures in the offer document about the show cause notice and the possible adverse impact of an order.
The General Order retains the timeline provided under the 2006 Order, but clarifies that if SEBI cannot conclude proceedings in 90 days for reasons beyond its control or owing to the conduct of entities other than the Parties, Observations should be kept in abeyance for a further period of 45 days. Then again, where the delay is due to the conduct of the Parties, the General Order provides that the Observations should be kept in abeyance until the conclusion of the proceedings.
If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.
This page contains general information regarding Trilegal and is not intended as a solicitation or an advertisement of its services or any invitation or inducement of any sort. Nothing contained in this website constitutes legal advice or creation of a lawyer-client relationship. If you have any issues, you must seek legal advice. Trilegal is not liable for the consequences of any action taken by relying on the material/information provided on this website. For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.