Search Your Queries Related To Trilegal


Tax Updates: April 2022

09 May 2022

Banking-Finance-Regulatory-Enforcement-Capital-Market-Asset finance regulatory enforcement capital market asset management tax thumb image
This update covers key judicial developments and important notifications in the month of April 2022 relating to direct tax, tax on lotteries, GST, service tax and entry tax.
Partner: Himanshu Sinha, Counsels: Shashank Shekhar, Aditi Goyal, Senior Associates: Tushar Joshi, Bhuwan Dhoopar, Associates: Samyak Jain, Yash Agarwal

Direct Tax

Supreme Court upholds the validity of assessment made in the case of a nonexistent amalgamating entity

The Supreme Court in PCIT v Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd. (Mahagun Ruling) upheld the validity of an assessment order made in the case of a non-existent entity, Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd. (MRPL), which had merged into Mahagun India Private Limited (MIPL) by an order of the Delhi High Court dated 10 September 2007.

This ruling seemingly unsettles a prior ruling of the Supreme Court in PCIT v Maruti Suzuki India Limited (Maruti Suzuki Ruling) which held that once an amalgamating company ceases to exist, it cannot be regarded as a ‘person’ under the income tax law. Therefore, the Revenue can neither initiate a tax proceeding nor pass an order against such an entity.

However, the facts in the Mahagun Ruling are slightly different to those in the Maruti Suzuki Ruling. In the Maruti Suzuki Ruling, the assessee had disclosed the fact of its amalgamation to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) even before the case being selected for scrutiny. In the Mahagun Ruling, MRPL (i.e., the amalgamating company) consistently held itself out as the assessee before tax officers and courts even after its amalgamation.

As mentioned above, MRPL amalgamated with MIPL by virtue of an order of the Delhi High Court dated 10 September 2007. The order provided that the amalgamation would take effect from 1 April 2006. A search and seizure operation was undertaken against the Mahagun group (including MIPL and MRPL) on 27 August 2008. The directors of both companies were questioned during these proceedings. Even at this stage, the directors did not disclose to the Revenue that MRPL had merged into MIPL and had ceased to exist. Further, in response to notices issued after the search and seizure operation, MRPL filed a return of income in its own name and with its own PAN number. The return of income did not disclose that the company had undergone a merger and had ceased to exist, despite a specific disclosure requirement. Consequently, the AO passed an assessment order in the name of ‘Mahagun Realtors (P) Ltd., represented by Mahagun India Private Limited’. The assessee also filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a similar manner.

Download PDF to read more

Subscribe to our Knowledge Repository

If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.


    Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website,, you acknowledge that:

    • You are seeking information about Trilegal of your own accord and there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Trilegal or its members.
    • This website should not be construed as providing legal advice for any purpose.
    • All information, content, and materials available on this website are for general informational purposes only.
    • Any information obtained or material downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition, and any transmission, receipt or use of this website is not intended to, and will not, create any lawyer-client relationship.
    • Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Trilegal is not liable for the consequences of any action taken by any person based on any material or information available on this website, or for any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information or interpretation thereof.
    • Readers of this website or recipients of content or information available on this website should not act based on any or all such content or information, and should always seek advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice in the appropriate jurisdiction.
    • Third party links contained on this website re-directing users to such third-party websites should neither be construed as legal reference / legal advice, nor considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with, any such third party website operators.
    • The communication platform provided on this website should not be used for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information.
    • The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Trilegal.

    We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:

    • The types of information we collect and why we collect them.
    • How we use your information to provide a personalized experience.
    • The measures we take to ensure the security of your data.
    • Your rights and choices in managing your personal information.
    • How we may share information with trusted partners for specific purpose.

    For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.

    Up arrow