Search Your Queries Related To Trilegal


Bombay High Court: Sanctioned layout not mandatory for registering sale deeds of fragmented land

25 May 2022

Residual Power Image
The Bombay High Court has struck down a circular mandating that a sanctioned layout is compulsory to register sale documents for land parcels below the standard area prescribed in the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947.
Partner: Mridul Kumbalath, Counsel: Sadaf Shaikh, Senior Associate: Dilnaz Bapasola, Associate: Sharul Jain, Senior Associate-KM: Varnika Jain


The Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (Act) was enacted to prevent fragmentation of agricultural holdings into smaller land parcels and provide for their consolidation for the purpose of better cultivation. Section 8B of the Act was introduced by the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings (Amendment) Act, 2015 (2015 Amendment Act). The proviso to Section 8B prescribes that no person shall transfer any parcel of land in specified areas (as set out in the Section, including areas within the limits of a municipal corporation) which has an area less than the standard area notified before the date of coming into force of the 2015 Amendment Act, unless such land parcel is created as a result of sub-division or the layout is approved by the planning authority or by the Collector under the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 or any other law for the time being in force.

Further, Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 (Rules) prescribes certain requirements to be verified before accepting a document for registration.

Subsequently, the Inspector General of Registration and Stamps, State of Maharashtra, Pune, issued a circular on 12 July 2021 (Circular) directing the Sub-Registrar not to register any sale/transfer deed related to land parcels falling within the scope of Section 8B of the Act unless the sanctioned layout is also enclosed with the documents.

In this backdrop, the case of Govind Ramling Solpure & Ors. v The State of Maharashtra & Ors. came up before the Bombay High Court since the Petitioners’ request to register sale deeds in respect of certain land parcels was refused by the concerned Sub-Registrar on the ground that the sale deeds were in violation of the Circular. Aggrieved by this decision, the Petitioners approached the Bombay High Court praying that Rule 44(1)(i) be declared contrary to Sections 34, 35 and 69 of the Registration Act, 1908 (Registration Act) and hence be struck down and the Circular issued exercising the power under the said Rule be quashed and set aside.

Download PDF to read more

Subscribe to our Knowledge Repository

If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.


    Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website,, you acknowledge that:

    • You are seeking information about Trilegal of your own accord and there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Trilegal or its members.
    • This website should not be construed as providing legal advice for any purpose.
    • All information, content, and materials available on this website are for general informational purposes only.
    • Any information obtained or material downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition, and any transmission, receipt or use of this website is not intended to, and will not, create any lawyer-client relationship.
    • Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Trilegal is not liable for the consequences of any action taken by any person based on any material or information available on this website, or for any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information or interpretation thereof.
    • Readers of this website or recipients of content or information available on this website should not act based on any or all such content or information, and should always seek advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice in the appropriate jurisdiction.
    • Third party links contained on this website re-directing users to such third-party websites should neither be construed as legal reference / legal advice, nor considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with, any such third party website operators.
    • The communication platform provided on this website should not be used for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information.
    • The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Trilegal.

    We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:

    • The types of information we collect and why we collect them.
    • How we use your information to provide a personalized experience.
    • The measures we take to ensure the security of your data.
    • Your rights and choices in managing your personal information.
    • How we may share information with trusted partners for specific purpose.

    For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.

    Up arrow