Search Your Queries Related To Trilegal


Delhi High Court: Transitioning Cenvat credit from the erstwhile indirect tax regime to the GST regime allowed till 30 June 2020

11 May 2020

The Delhi High Court, in Reliance Elektrik Works v. Union of India has held that Cenvat Credit availed under the erstwhile indirect tax regime can be transitioned to the GST regime by 30 June 2020.


Under the erstwhile indirect tax regime, a manufacturer or service provider could avail credit of the tax paid on goods and services (known as inputs and input services) used by it in the manufacture of the final product or for providing output services. This credit was called Cenvat Credit.

With the advent of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime, one of the major concerns of taxpayers was the preservation of this Cenvat Credit that had accrued to them under the previous indirect tax regime.

To address these concerns, specific transitionary provisions were incorporated in the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act) and CGST Rules, 2017 (CGST Rules) to enable taxpayers to transition Cenvat Credit to the GST regime. The manner of transitioning was specifically provided under Rule 117 of the CGST Rules which prescribed Form GST TRAN-1 (Form) for this purpose. An initial time limit of 27 December 2017 was stipulated in the CGST Rules for uploading Form on the GSTN portal.

This time limit for filing the Form was later extended on several occasions before finally being fixed to 31 March 2020 for special cases where the taxpayers could not upload the form on account of technical issues on the GSTN portal.

Rule 117 of the CGST Rules was however challenged by taxpayers before various High Courts across the country on the grounds that the rule exceeded the authority of CGST Act and restricted their right to transition Cenvat Credit to the GST regime by imposing a time limit which otherwise did not exist in the CGST Act. The courts consistently held that the taxpayers had indefeasible right over the Cenvat Credit which had accrued to them and granted them relief by directing the GST authorities to allow filing of the Form even beyond the prescribed time limit. However, the High Courts did not address the issue regarding the legality of Rule 117.

Delhi High Court Decision

In the present decision, the Delhi High Court examined the legality of Rule 117 of the CGST Rules. It held that Rule 117 is merely directory in nature and that the procedure laid down in the rules cannot affect the substantive right of the taxpayer to transition the accrued Cenvat Credit.

Further, addressing the time limit for transitioning such credit, the Delhi High Court held that the residuary limitation period of 3 years would apply and taxpayers who have filed or attempted to file the Form within three years of enactment of GST i.e. by 30 June 2020, will be entitled to transition the Cenvat Credit.

This judgment of the Delhi High Court comes as a great relief to taxpayers who had filed the Form with incorrect details or could not file the Form at all and were unable to transition such Cenvat Credit. They will now be permitted to do so by 30 June 2020.

Download PDF to read more

Subscribe to our Knowledge Repository

If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.


    Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website,, you acknowledge that:

    • You are seeking information about Trilegal of your own accord and there has been no form of solicitation, advertisement or inducement by Trilegal or its members.
    • This website should not be construed as providing legal advice for any purpose.
    • All information, content, and materials available on this website are for general informational purposes only.
    • Any information obtained or material downloaded from this website is completely at the user’s volition, and any transmission, receipt or use of this website is not intended to, and will not, create any lawyer-client relationship.
    • Information on this website may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information. Trilegal is not liable for the consequences of any action taken by any person based on any material or information available on this website, or for any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information or interpretation thereof.
    • Readers of this website or recipients of content or information available on this website should not act based on any or all such content or information, and should always seek advice of competent legal counsel licensed to practice in the appropriate jurisdiction.
    • Third party links contained on this website re-directing users to such third-party websites should neither be construed as legal reference / legal advice, nor considered as referrals to, endorsements of, or affiliations with, any such third party website operators.
    • The communication platform provided on this website should not be used for exchange of any confidential, business or politically sensitive information.
    • The contents of this website are the intellectual property of Trilegal.

    We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:

    • The types of information we collect and why we collect them.
    • How we use your information to provide a personalized experience.
    • The measures we take to ensure the security of your data.
    • Your rights and choices in managing your personal information.
    • How we may share information with trusted partners for specific purpose.

    For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.

    Up arrow