A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court has recently re-examined the scope of powers of an adjudicating authority under Section 7(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) to initiate the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) while deciding on a financial creditor’s application, in M Suresh Kumar Reddy v Canara Bank and Ors. (Suresh Kumar Reddy). The issue under consideration in Suresh Kumar Reddy was whether the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) possesses the power and jurisdiction to examine concerns extraneous to debt and default while considering a financial creditor’s application to initiate the insolvency resolution process.
The issue arose when the Supreme Court was asked to decide an appeal filed by a corporate debtor against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), where the NCLAT had refused to set aside the CIRP initiated against the said debtor.
Clarity on the scope of powers of the NCLT in relation to deciding on a financial creditor’s application has been awaited since the Supreme Court’s decision in Vidarbha Industries v Axis Bank Limited (Vidarbha) in July 2022. In Vidarbha, the Supreme Court had held that the NCLT possesses sufficient discretion to not admit a financial creditor’s application even if the existence of financial debt and its default is proven based on the evidence as required under the IBC.Download PDF to read more
If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.
Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.trilegal.com, you acknowledge that: