26 May 2020
One of the pertinent issues landlords and tenants in India are grappling with during the COVID-19 crisis is the suspension of monthly rentals during the government announced lockdown periods. In its judgment dated 21 May 2020 in Ramanand and Others v. Dr. Girish Soni and Others[1] (Case), the Delhi High Court (Court) has held that the period of lockdown on account of COVID-19 does not excuse the payment of rental amounts.
The tenant in the Case was occupying a commercial property in one of Delhi’s most sought after commercial spaces. The Case involved an eviction order passed against the tenant in an eviction petition filed by the landlord before the rent control authority under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958. When the matter reached the Court, it stayed the operation of the eviction order by an interim order, subject to deposit of an enhanced monthly rental amount of Rs. 3.5 lakhs, as against a rental amount of Rs. 300 per month being paid earlier. In these proceedings, the tenant approached the Court seeking suspension of rent on account of the COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent lockdown. The circumstances of COVID-19 pandemic and the consequent lockdown were contended to be force majeure and beyond the control of the tenant.
The Court examined the provisions of the Contract Act, 1872 (Contract Act) and the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 (TOPA) before concluding that the tenant’s request for suspension of rent was liable to be rejected.
The Court specifically analysed situations where a contract (including a lease) contains a force majeure clause and provides for actions to be taken pursuant to the said clause and where the lease did not provide for a force majeure clause. The Court’s analysis was as follows:
Download PDF to read more
SEBI circular on additional disclosures by Foreign Portfolio Investors
19 Sep 2023
SEBI’s proposal on fixed-price delisting: A boost to public M&A
31 Aug 2023
Digital Personal Data Protection Act Repository
08 Aug 2023
Supreme Court on the powers of the NCLT to initiate the corporate insolvency process on a financial creditor’s application
07 Jul 2023
Supreme Court on the enforceability of an unstamped or insufficiently stamped arbitration agreement
05 May 2023
The Supreme Court on constitutionality and interpretation of provisions of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002
17 Aug 2022If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.
Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.trilegal.com, you acknowledge that:
We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:
For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.
