The central government has notified the central rules under all four Labour Codes, providing operational clarity on key aspects of wage administration, social security, workplace safety and industrial relations. The rules introduce important compliance requirements and clarifications, including on gratuity for fixed-term employees, maternity benefits, appointment letters, employment of women during night shifts, and worker grievance mechanisms. However, their applicability remains limited to establishments for which the central government is the appropriate government, and broader implementation of the Labour Codes continues to depend on state-level rulemaking.
Partner: Atul Gupta, Senior Associate: Tania Gupta, Associate: Lekha Suki
On 8 May 2026, the central government notified the Code on Wages (Central) Rules 2026 (Central Wage Rules), the Social Security (Central) Rules 2026 (Central SS Rules), the Industrial Relations (Central) Rules 2026 (Central IR Rules), and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions (Central) Rules 2026 (Central OSH Rules) (collectively, the Central Rules). Read together with the notifications being issued by the government(s), the Central Rules operationalise a significant portion of India’s new labour law framework under the Code on Wages 2019 (Wage Code), the Code on Social Security 2020 (SS Code), the Industrial Relations Code 2020 (IR Code) and the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code 2020 (OSH Code) (collectively, the Labour Codes).
However, the immediate impact of the Central Rules is not uniform. These rules apply only to establishments for which the central government is the ‘appropriate government’ under the Labour Codes. This covers public sector undertakings and operations in sectors such as railways, mines, ports, telecom, banking, and insurance that are owned or controlled, in some manner, by the central government. Under the SS Code, the central government is the ‘appropriate government’ even for privately held establishments that have departments or branches in more than one state (similar to the earlier position under the Gratuity Act and Rules). Under the OSH Code, the state government remains the ‘appropriate government’ for specific establishments such as factories, motor transport undertakings, plantations, newspaper establishments, and beedi and cigar establishments, irrespective of whether they are privately owned or central government establishments.
While some states like Gujarat have implemented corresponding state rules, most states in India have not. As a result, implementation of the Labour Codes is not uniform across states and, in certain instances, is contingent upon further state-level rules.
The key takeaways from each of the Central Rules are set out below.
The Central SS Rules primarily establish the institutional framework contemplated under the SS Code. They prescribe the composition, administration, duties, procedure and functioning of various social security institutions, such as the Central Board of Trustees of the Employees’ Provident Fund (EPF), the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), and National and State Social Security Boards.
Although much of the framework is administrative, several provisions have practical significance for employers and employees. Most notably, the Central SS Rules prescribe the form and manner in which appeals may be filed before the EPF Tribunal, including electronic filing of written submissions. This is part of the larger objective of modernising social security adjudication and improving accessibility.
The Central SS Rules also expand the health and welfare-oriented spending under the Employee’s State Insurance (ESI) scheme. The ESIC is now authorised to incur expenditure up to INR 1,000 crore annually (or such other amount notified by the central government) on welfare initiatives, including annual medical examinations for insured persons above 40 years of age and rehabilitation and re-employment of insured persons who suffered workplace injury or disability.
These rules also quantify certain benefits. For instance, a medical bonus of INR 15,000 is payable to women employees and wives of persons insured with the ESI for up to two births if the confinement occurs in a facility outside the ESI scheme.
A further clarification relates to maternity benefits. The SS Code permits denial of maternity benefits only where a woman employee is dismissed for ‘gross misconduct’. The Central SS Rules now define that expression exhaustively to mean:
The Central SS Rules also establish an appellate mechanism that permits an aggrieved woman to appeal the denial of a maternity benefit within 60 days and requires the relevant authority to decide the appeal within three months.
They further address a long-debated issue on gratuity for fixed-term employees by clarifying that gratuity becomes payable only upon completion of one year of service. This is likely to be particularly relevant for employers in sectors that rely on fixed-term employment arrangements.
The Central Wage Rules prescribe methodologies for calculating minimum wages, including daily and hourly wage rates, variable dearness allowance and floor wages. They also explain how to make permissible deductions from wages. These technical provisions are likely to reduce inconsistencies of interpretation in wage computation and compliance requirements.
The rules also prescribe the procedure for compounding offences not punishable with imprisonment or with imprisonment and fines, potentially reducing litigation exposure for employers in cases of procedural or technical non-compliance.
The Central OSH Rules provide operational measures and guidance for several employer obligations under the OSH Code relating to workplace health, safety and welfare. These include annual medical examinations, establishment of safety committees, and protocols for reporting incidents and diseases. These rules introduce a format for issuing appointment letters to all employees. Existing contracts must be updated to incorporate the mandatory terms within three months of the rules coming into force. Employers would be advised to review existing employment documentation and onboarding processes to ensure alignment.
The rules also prescribe detailed safeguards for the employment of women during night shifts (between 7.00 pm and 6.00 am). Employers seeking to engage women during these hours must satisfy multiple conditions, including obtaining written consent, providing transportation, ensuring adequate CCTV coverage in the premises, maintaining access to sanitation and drinking water facilities, and displaying contact information for emergencies.
The Central OSH Rules further simplify certain administrative requirements by consolidating multiple statutory registers into a single annual return filing system. They also create a formal grievance redressal mechanism for contract labour. Contract workers may raise concerns regarding health, working conditions and wages before a committee comprising representatives of the principal employer and the contractor. This expands accountability across the labour supply chain rather than being limited to the contractor level.
The Central IR Rules primarily operationalise the institutional mechanisms of the IR Code, intended to facilitate workplace dispute resolution and support workers affected by retrenchment. They provide the framework for the constitution and functioning of the works committee and grievance redressal committee. They also prescribe the manner of administering the worker re-skilling fund, including the collection of funds from employers and their onward transfer to the retrenched worker by the government. The worker re-skilling fund has since been notified by the central government separately.
The notification of the Central Rules represents a significant milestone in India’s labour law reform journey. For establishments covered by the central government, the Rules provide operational clarity on several aspects of wage administration, social security, workplace safety and industrial relations.
However, the broader transition to the Labour Codes remains far from complete. The continuing dependence on state-level rulemaking means that implementation remains fragmented across jurisdictions and sectors. As a result, employers should assess their compliance obligations on a code-by-code and state-by-state basis. For now, the Central Rules signal meaningful progress towards the implementation of a harmonised national labour law framework.
If you require any further information about the material contained in this newsletter, please get in touch with your Trilegal relationship partner or send an email to alerts@trilegal.com. The contents of this newsletter are intended for informational purposes only and are not in the nature of a legal opinion. Readers are encouraged to seek legal counsel prior to acting upon any of the information provided herein.
If you would like to receive content directly in your inbox from our knowledge repository, please complete this subscription form. This service is reserved for clients and eligible contacts.
Under the rules of the Bar Council of India, Trilegal is prohibited from soliciting work or advertising in any form or manner. By accessing this website, www.trilegal.com, you acknowledge that:
We prioritize your privacy. Before proceeding, we encourage you to read our privacy policy, which outlines the below, and terms of use to understand how we handle your data:
For more information, please read our terms of use and our privacy policy.